Jim Lauria: A Valentine to Women Who Keep the Water Flowing

A Valentine to Women Who Keep the Water Flowing – by Jim Lauria

As we men scramble to remember our sweethearts on this Valentine’s Day, our thoughts tend to drift toward life’s luxuries — chocolates, roses and wine. But this Valentine’s Day, I’m thinking about something much more fundamental — water. Not just the water to refresh the roses, but the water that sustains us all. Valentine’s Day seems to be a perfect time to thank women, billions of whom are committed to nourishing the world with clean, safe water.

After all, the female connection to water goes far beyond the symbolism found in literature and legend, well past the traditional symbolic links between women and the tides. In the developing countries of the world, right now, there are millions of women hauling water for their families from distant wells, rivers and lakes. According to the United Nations Population Fund, they’re walking an average of 6 km — 3.7 miles — per day to collect water. (Water weighs 8 pounds per gallon. Think about carrying a bucket of it for miles.) In conflict zones around the world, from Darfur to Latin America, they are risking their very lives as they walk those dangerous miles for water — and they’re carrying life itself back to their families.

Here in the U.S., where water is as close as the nearest tap, girls can look up to role models we can all admire — Christine Todd Whitman and Lisa Jackson, past and present administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). During her tenure as head of the EPA, Whitman tightened standards for arsenic in drinking water and grappled with the Bush Administration’s efforts to sweep climate change discussions under the rug. Following Whitman’s successor, the feckless Stephen Johnson, current EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is proving to be another woman of courage and commitment. Coming into the role with a couple of chemical engineering degrees and long experience in environmental protection at the state and federal levels certainly doesn’t hurt. Her big test will be how she handles the chromium-6 issue — wrangling the heated debate between science and hysteria surrounding the contaminant and appropriate limits in drinking water.

Speaking of the EPA, the agency is helping Girl Scouts gain insight into water issues as young women from Brownies to Seniors earn their Water Drop patch, working their way through a beautifully crafted manual on water created in partnership with the Girl Scouts of America.

Boy Scouts can earn a Soil and Water Conservation merit badge, and they tackle water-and-oil questions in merit badges for chemistry and environmental science. But if they want to dive deeper into water, they’re better off taking their swim tests — the most recent entry on BSA’s book list for soil and water conservation is a decade old.

Come on, fellas. Here in the U.S., scientific literacy — and water literacy — are growing more important every day. Perhaps our Girl Scouts (and the leaders many of those young women will become) will help us understand and manage the pressing issues surrounding our water supply by choosing to become the next generation of scientists and engineers.

Back in the developing nations, the need is more basic and more desperate. After hours of bringing water back to their homes, millions of women have to make the decision — a real-life Sophie’s Choice — between supplying their growing children or washing their babies. Slake their thirst or clean their butts? Both are vital. Our mission should be to ease their burden — to make household water more locally available, and safer, so those women can keep their families healthy.

So as we fill up vases today for bouquets of cut flowers, let’s not neglect to think about women and water… and to learn something from them about protecting the resource that sustains us all.

Still drinking your Fluoride?

I read this article on the WEF’s website and it certainly reminded me that the concept of municipal mass-medication is severely flawed. It is incomprehensible to me that anyone in their right mind would attempt to apply a nutritional supplement or medicine through drinking water, since there is no control over the amount of water people drink in a day and there appears to be no consideration give to varying body types, interfering chemicals and consumption volumes. I’m not a doctor, so I am hopelessly unqualified to comment on the merits of ingesting fluoride; if fluoride is good for you and acts as a medicine to protect teeth/bones and has serious overdose side-effects like mottling, fluorosis etc… then it should be applied by a competent medical professional like a doctor or dentist. From my own personal research it appears that topical applications of fluoride are best, instead of ingestion, so I certainly am not interested in me or my family to be drinking fluoride at all. I hope the lesson learned here is that cities shouldn’t attempt mass-medication and instead deliver water that is as clean as possible without adding chemicals to it that could affect human health.

I personally choose not to drink “nutrients” or “medicines” in my water. I’d much rather drink clean, clear delicious water and add nutritional supplements/medicines as necessary in dosages appropriate for my body size and prevailing medical conditions based on the recommendation of my health practitioner.

Is there less lead in our water now?

The 111th Congress has passed an amendment to the Safe Drinking Water Act which creates a federal limit of 0.25% for the maximum lead content of any plumbing component used for potable water intended for human consumption that is smaller than 2″ in diameter. I think that the intent of this bill is good, but it really doesn’t do more than make people feel good and cause a massive increase in the cost of delivered components, especially brass which is very difficult and costly to machine when the lead levels drop that low. Municipal distribution piping is a greater source of lead than the fixtures themselves, and should be addressed as a much higher priority. This bill will become effective in 2013, so expect an influx of high-lead components from China over the next year or two.

Salt Lake City’s water unsafe, according to EWG

I read this article in the Salt Lake Tribune this morning… The EWG is drawing attention to the presence of Hexavalent Chromium in water supplies nation-wide. Yes, this is an important issue, but one can’t react emotionally to information like this and we certainly don’t need more federal regulation. Since less than 1% of municipally supplied water is actually consumed by humans, why should the other 99% be treated to “drinking” water levels? It just doesn’t make sense!